This is a free sample excerpt of the paper. Join to view the full essay
|
R. V. Keilty
Part 1 of Paper
.... He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada on
the grounds that the trial judge erred in law. The facts in the case were not
disputed but the actual definition of possession under section 2 of the
Narcotic Control Act was the issue. The appellant never actually did sell the
narcotics nor did he at anytime have.... Part 2 of Paper
....me the narcotics. In the case R.v.Piscopo it was
demonstrated that an accused can be convicted upon circumstantial evidence. The
accused can be convicted using all of the aforementioned cases. Another issue
is that if this case becomes precedent it would open a "floodgate" or loophole
in the law where other criminals may escape through. This would allow for more
dangerous dealers of narcotics, who operate their business "long distance" to
escape prosecution because they never actually had th.... |
| Number of words: 729 - Approximate pages: 3 |
|
Here are PaperHelp we are used to dealing with students in a rush to complete their research papers on a tight deadline. That is why when you
join our site, your account is activated immediately enabling you to get the information you need as quickly as possible. We also know that
students usually are on a tight budget, which is why we give you access to a large number of papers, 45,000+ to exact, for one low monthly
price. With so many essays available, there is a very good chance you'll be able to find what you need. So join today and get your paper
done.
| Length |
Membership Type |
Price |
Register |
| 30 days |
recurring |
$19.95 |
| 90 days |
recurring |
$39.95 |
| 180 days |
non-recurring |
$69.95 |
|
|
|
