This is a free sample excerpt of the paper. Join to view the full essay
|
Mitchell V. Wisconsin: Why Mitchell V. Wisconsin Sucked
Part 1 of Paper
.... imposes harsher sentences on criminals who
"intentionally select the person against whom the crime...is committed..because
of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin
or ancestry of that person." Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of
the unanimous Court. This paper argues .... Part 2 of Paper
....ent law
allowed Mitchell to be sentenced to up to seven years. The jury sentenced
Mitchell to four years, twice the maximum for the crime he committed without
the penalty enhancement law.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling was faulty, and defied a number of
precedents. The Wisconsin law is unconstitutional, and is essentially
unenforceable. This paper primarily focuses on the constitutional arguments
against Chief Justice Rehnquist's decision and the statute itself, but will
also conside.... |
| Number of words: 3340 - Approximate pages: 13 |
|
Here are PaperHelp we are used to dealing with students in a rush to complete their research papers on a tight deadline. That is why when you
join our site, your account is activated immediately enabling you to get the information you need as quickly as possible. We also know that
students usually are on a tight budget, which is why we give you access to a large number of papers, 45,000+ to exact, for one low monthly
price. With so many essays available, there is a very good chance you'll be able to find what you need. So join today and get your paper
done.
| Length |
Membership Type |
Price |
Register |
| 30 days |
recurring |
$19.95 |
| 90 days |
recurring |
$39.95 |
| 180 days |
non-recurring |
$69.95 |
|
|
|
